Thursday, July 28, 2011

City of Seattle - Energy Benchmarking




Seattle’s Building Energy Benchmarking & Reporting Ordinance
Informational Forum for Energy Efficiency Service Providers
WHEN: August 11, 2011
FROM: 1:30 to 3:00 pm
WHERE: Seattle Municipal Tower, 700 5th Avenue,
Seattle Conference Room 4050/60 (40th Floor)


The Seattle Department of Planning and Development and the Northwest Energy Efficiency Council are hosting an informational forum on August 11, 2011 for energy service providers interested in learning more about the market opportunities being created by the City’s building energy benchmarking and reporting ordinance. Owners of more than 8,000 buildings throughout the city will be required to benchmark and report on the energy performance of their buildings over the next nine months. Although many will choose to do this work themselves, or will use in-house resources, many others may opt to turn to outside service providers for assistance with benchmarking and with identifying and implementing follow-on energy efficiency improvements.

Forum attendees will learn more about this new program, and will be able to provide input to staff on what the City of Seattle can do to help building owners find the trade ally resources they need.

Who should attend?
• ESCOs
• Energy efficiency consultants
• Energy auditors
• Mechanical/electrical contractors
• Individuals looking to enter the energy efficiency field

What do I need to know about the Building Energy Benchmarking Requirement?
• Why is Seattle requiring building energy benchmarking and reporting?
• Who does this requirement apply to?
• When do building owners need to comply?
• What do building owners need to do?
• What services are building owners likely to need?
• What will building owners do with the information they get from benchmarking?

REGISTRATION
Space is limited - please RSVP to:
Brittany@putnamprice.com

FOR MORE INFORMAT ION
Jayson Antonoff, Program Manager
PHONE: 206.386.9791
EMAIL: Jayson.Antonoff@seattle.gov
WEBSITE: www.seattle.gov/dpd/EnergyBenchmarking

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Job Listing - Applied Equipment Sales

Applied Equipment Sales Inc.
607 SW Grady Way, Suite 110
Renton, WA 98057

SALES ENGINEER -- Commercial HVAC
Company: Applied Equipment Sales Inc
Working Location: Renton, Washington
Position: Outside Sales Engineer
Territory: Washington

GENERAL SUMMARY

The candidate will promote sales by offering technical support to local HVAC consulting engineers, contractors, and distributor partners. The ideal candidate will be proficient in HVAC design and application; being able to understand and explain the advantages of different types of mechanical systems, experience with equipment sizing, and understanding basic installation practices. A working knowledge of Washington State and Seattle Energy Code is a must and experience with energy modeling software is a strong plus. The candidate should possess excellent written and verbal communication skills. No previous sales experience necessary.
Prior experience with VRF/VRV design a strong plus.

Essential Duties and Responsibilities

• Call on HVAC consulting engineers and contractors
• Assist distributor sales force as needed
• Conduct technical product presentations
Education: BSME or equivalent
Experience: 2-4 years design experience or related HVAC industry experience preferred

Base Salary: $ 55,000-$70,000 DOE
Commission Bonus based on performance
Competitive Benefit package and company paid expenses

Contact: Jim Huckins jimh@go-aes.com 425-241-1387

ASHRAE - News Release:

For Release:
July 26, 2011

Contact: Jodi Scott
Public Relations
678-539-1140
jscott@ashrae.org

What is Energy Use Intensity? ASHRAE Seeks to Define, Educate

ATLANTA – While the importance of building energy performance metrics to reduce energy use is accepted worldwide, there is no single generally accepted definition of that metric. Currently, proposed relative energy use reduction targets are subject to interpretation and difficult to verify.

Under a new initiative, ASHRAE is working to define one clear, logical metric to move the building industry toward producing net zero energy buildings by 2030. The U.S. Congress has mandated a series of relative fossil fuel energy use reductions in federal buildings ending in a 100 percent reduction of fossil fuel energy by 2030. Congress is considering applying similar relative energy use reductions in all buildings through the use of building energy codes adopted by state and local government.

“We must address buildings as entire living entities,” ASHRAE President Ron Jarnagin said. “As such, we need to establish energy targets for building design that provide a total building energy use goal to strive toward that can subsequently drive the development and application of any number of prescriptive solutions.”

A forum seeking input on the energy target initiative was held at ASHRAE’s 2011 Annual Conference in Montreal, June 25-29. Also, ASHRAE has developed a public policy brief asking Congress to foster collaboration among the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and ASHRAE along with partner organizations to:



  • Establish a single objective definition of energy use intensity (EUI) for the design of commercial buildings

  • Determine a single objective baseline EUI for design of commercial buildings from which to measure relative energy use reductions

  • Create a performance environment that will support reduction in energy consumption associated with all loads in commercial buildings

  • Identify a single objective set of commercial building types and simulation models for establishment of target design EUIs

  • Produce one set of design target EUIs for the commercial building sector to guide the development of future energy codes and standards and building energy codes adopted by state and local government

“EUIs are very helpful for setting performance- based designs goals,” Jarnagin said. “The current focus on reduction of energy use in building stock has made the use of EUIs popular by governmental organizations, non-government organizations and building industry groups, including ASHRAE. Given that there is no clear single definition for EUIs, comparing one organization’s EUI goals to another’s is confusing, particularly since everyone tends to use the same units, kBTU/ft²-yr. Our goal is to develop and promote technical tools to assist the commercial building design and construction industry in moving toward higher performing buildings. Defining design energy use targets is a large part of achieving that goal.”

Chapter Officers

ASHRAE Puget Sound Chapter
CHAPTER OFFICERS 2010-2011
& Board of Governors

President
Jason Hall
Phone: 206.304.1509

President-Elect
Alan Burt
Phone: 1.877.335.7866

Vice President/Secretary
Michel Sotura
Phone: 206.623.0717

Treasurer/Governor
Tamas Bencsik
Phone: 206.448.3376

Governor
Kathi Shoemake
Phone: 206.448.3376

Governor/Past President
Brian Wolford
Phone: 206.767.2600

Mount Baker Subsection
Carl Garrison
Phone: 360.707.5656

Thursday, July 21, 2011

NEEA - Better Bricks - City of Seattle

August 3, 2011

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Training

NEEA BetterBricks and the City of Seattle offer this FREE workshop for building owners, property managers and service providers to support compliance with the City of Seattle’s building energy benchmarking and disclosure ordinance. This hands-on session will teach you how to benchmark your building’s energy performance using the free on-line tool ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager. Participants will also learn about the ordinance reporting requirements and new services available for automated benchmarking from Seattle City Light, Puget Sound Energy and Seattle Steam. Registration required.

8:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
University of Washington
Mary Gates Hall, Room 044
Seattle, WA

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

ASHRAE - News Release:

For Release:
July 20, 2011
Contact: Amanda Dean
Public Relations
678-539-1216
adean@ashrae.org

ASHRAE Supports Funding for Important Building Data Survey on the House Floor

ATLANTA—ASHRAE received Congressional support from co-chairs of the High-Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus regarding the Society’s call to the federal government to resume work on the 2011 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS).

On July 13, Representatives Judy Biggert (R-Ill.) and Russ Carnahan (D-Mo.) delivered a colloquy on the House floor in strong support of funding and resuming work on the 2011 CBECS. Joining in the colloquy, the chairman and ranking Democrat of the House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee, Representatives Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) and Peter Visclosky (D-Ind.), also lent their support to the importance of CBECS data.

Carnahan quoted a letter from ASHRAE issued in May, strongly urging Congress to include funding for CBECS in the Fiscal Year 2012 appropriations bills to allow work on the 2011 edition of the Survey to continue. The letter was submitted to the Congressional Record. “If funding is not provided, work on the 2011 CBECS data will likely not continue, and the government and industry will be forced to rely on data that is nearly a decade old, resulting in potential missed opportunities to increase building efficiency,” Carnahan read from the ASHRAE letter on the House floor.

Earlier this year the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) announced it would not be releasing the results of the 2007 CBECS due to data collection errors. As a result of funding reductions, EIA also announced that it would halt work on the 2011 edition of the Survey. Currently, the latest version of CBECS data is from 2003.

“Many members of the High Performance Building Coalition have come to us to express their concern about an updated CBECS since the latest data is nearly a decade old,” Biggert said while addressing the House. “Substantial investments in the commercial building sector have been made since the last CBECS was published in 2003. The updated data is not only valuable to building owners looking to make improvements, but also necessary to inform the Annual Energy Outlook that we, in Congress, rely on.”

ASHRAE led the establishment of the HPB Congressional Caucus in 2008 to heighten awareness and inform policymakers about the major impact buildings have on our health, safety and welfare and the opportunities to design, construct and operate high-performance buildings that reflect our concern for these impacts.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

ASHRAE - Government Affairs Update

Good day and welcome to ASHRAE's Government Affairs Update. Along with the Government Affairs Webpage, these periodic updates feature information on government affairs-related activities of interest to ASHRAE members and others interested in the built environment. Archives of previous updates are available from the Government Affairs Webpage (http://www.ashrae.org/advocacy).

Please pass this information on to interested colleagues who also may subscribe from the ASHRAE Government Affairs Webpage.

If you have any recommendations regarding content, or have questions about or would like to participate in Washington Office activities, please contact ASHRAE Government Affairs staff at (202) 833-1830 or washdc@ashrae.org.

ASHRAE Government Affairs Update, 7/15/11

• House Committee Leaders Come Out in Support of CBECS
• House Passes Energy & Water Funding Bill
• Senate Committee Amends, then Approves Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act


House Committee Leaders Come Out in Support of CBECS

The Democratic and Republican Co-Chairs of the High-Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus (HPBCC), and the Chairman and Ranking Democrat of the House Energy & Water Appropriations Subcommittee delivered a coordinated speech this week on the House floor in support of the Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS).

CBECS is a quadrennial national sample survey that collects information on the stock of U.S. commercial buildings, their energy-related building characteristics, and their energy consumption and expenditures. Commercial buildings include all buildings in which at least half of the floorspace is used for a purpose that is not residential, industrial, or agricultural, so they include building types that might not traditionally be considered “commercial,” such as schools, correctional institutions, and buildings used for religious worship[1].

Work on the 2011 CBECS has been suspended due to funding reductions in fiscal year 2011 for the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), which administers the Survey. Language in the House Energy & Water funding bill could have put the future of the Survey in jeopardy, and the House floor speeches this week were intended to convey to Senators and EIA leadership that CBECS is supported by key House Democrats and Republicans.

ASHRAE has been working with a large coalition of stakeholders to support resumption of the 2011 CBECS, and assisted preparing in House Members for their CBECS floor speeches.

As a public demonstration of stakeholder support for CBECS, House leaders entered into the Congressional Record a CBECS support letter ASHRAE had sent to key House Members.

With the House passage of the Energy & Water appropriations bill (described in the next section), the focus for supporting the resumption of the 2011 CBECS now goes to the Senate.

To view the CBECS House floor statements in the Congressional Record, please visit http://www.ashrae.org/advocacy/page/1348. The document will soon be posted to the Website, and will be located under the “Letters and Testimony” header.

House Passes Energy & Water Funding Bill

Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Energy & Water appropriations bill for fiscal year 2012. Although final numbers are still being analyzed, the bill would likely reduce funding for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by $491 million, including reducing the State Energy Program (SEP) by $25 million, the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) by $141.3 million, and the Building Technologies Program (BTP) by $60.5 million. All figures are compared to fiscal year 2011.

An effort was made to restore funds to fiscal year 2011 levels for SEP, WAP, and BTP in the form of an amendment offered by Representatives Paul Tonko (D-NY) and Charles Bass (R-NH), however this amendment failed by a vote of 149 to 273.

An amendment was added to the appropriations bill that would repeal energy efficiency standards for light bulbs. This amendment (H.AMDT.678 to H.R. 2354) would repeal the so-called “100-watt light bulb ban”. This added provision must still hold up in the Senate, where support for this provision is unclear.

After Congress acts on the U.S. debt ceiling, the Senate will begin work on its own Energy & Water appropriations bill for fiscal year 2012. The Senate is waiting for this action to occur because overall spending levels may change depending on the deal that is brokered to raise the debt ceiling.

For additional information on the House Energy & Water appropriations bill, please visit the House Appropriations Committee at http://appropriations.house.gov/.

Senate Committee Amends, then Approves Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act

After making several amendments, the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee approved the Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act of 2011 (S. 1000), clearing it for consideration on the Senate floor. Although the Committee approved the legislation, much work remains before it is debated and possibly passed in the Senate.

The Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act would establish energy targets for ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 and the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for commercial and residential buildings, respectively. Under this bill, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) would establish both aggregate and intermediate energy savings targets. If DOE determines that subsequent editions of Standard 90.1/IECC do not meet the energy targets, DOE may request changes to the relevant standard to meet the target, taking into consideration whether DOE’s proposed changes are technically feasible and life-cycle cost-effective, construction practices, and potential costs, savings, and other benefits for consumers and building owners, including the impact on overall building ownership and operating costs.

ASHRAE/the International Code Council (ICC) would have 180 days to incorporate these changes into 90.1/IECC. If ASHRAE/ICC does not incorporate these changes, DOE would create its own code to be used as the new national model building energy code for commercial/residential buildings. Such a code would be based on 90.1/IECC, but DOE may also consider other model codes or standards.

Major changes added to S. 1000 during consideration by the Energy & Natural Resources Committee include the deletion of the goal net-zero-energy for new commercial and residential buildings by 2030 for Standard 90.1 and the IECC. An amendment was also made to the bill that would protect the intellectual property rights of ASHRAE, ICC, and other nationally recognized code and standard developers if DOE uses all or part of 90.1, the IECC, or other codes and standards to establish model energy codes and standards for commercial and residential buildings.

The possible (“authorized”) funding level for the building codes section of S. 1000 was also increased from $100 million to $200 million. Additionally, the full cost of the bill would now be fully paid for.

Although the Energy & Natural Resources Committee approved the bill, Senate staff has committed to continue working with ASHRAE to further improve the bill.

ASHRAE Washington Office
1828 L Street, NW * Suite 906 * Washington, DC 20036
(202) 833-1830 * fax: (202) 833-0118 * washdc@ashrae.org
http://www.ashrae.org/advocacy